Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge launched a sharp attack on the Centre over the Indo-US trade deal, calling it a “betrayal” wrapped in public relations. His remarks have intensified the political debate around the agreement, with the Opposition questioning both its intent and its long-term impact on India’s economy.
Kharge alleged that the government is projecting the trade deal as a major diplomatic and economic achievement while hiding clauses that could hurt domestic industries, farmers, and small businesses. He claimed that the agreement prioritises optics and international image over the real interests of Indian citizens, and accused the Centre of failing to take the Opposition and stakeholders into confidence before moving ahead.
According to Kharge, trade agreements of such scale should be discussed transparently in Parliament, with clear explanations on how they will benefit local manufacturing, employment, and national self-reliance. He argued that instead of strengthening India’s economic position, the deal could increase dependence on foreign markets and corporations, putting pressure on local producers.
The Congress chief also questioned the timing and presentation of the deal, suggesting that it was being promoted aggressively to create a positive narrative rather than address genuine economic challenges. He warned that policies driven by publicity campaigns rather than ground realities could have serious consequences for the country in the long run.
The Centre has defended the Indo-US trade deal, maintaining that it will open new opportunities for Indian exporters, boost bilateral cooperation, and strengthen strategic ties between the two countries. Government leaders have dismissed the Opposition’s criticism as politically motivated and aimed at undermining India’s global partnerships.
Political observers say Kharge’s remarks reflect growing Opposition resistance to the government’s economic and foreign policy decisions. As debates over the trade deal continue, the issue is expected to feature prominently in Parliament and public discourse, with both sides seeking to shape the narrative around national interest, economic growth, and global engagement.
For now, Kharge’s description of the Indo-US trade deal as a “betrayal” has added fresh fuel to the political fire, ensuring that the agreement remains under intense scrutiny in the days ahead.
For more details and the fastest updates, follow us on @namma.updates. Stay informed and stay connected.